Software for millwork, cabinetry and countertop shops
Between the quote and the install there are four handoffs, and one wrong revision scraps an entire run of material. The shop is efficient. The approval process around it is a chain of emails.
Field service and construction. The category platforms already exist. We build the thirty percent they refuse to: the integrations, the follow-up, the reporting, the customer-facing portal.
Sub-niches covered: Kitchen and bath cabinetry, Commercial and institutional millwork, Stone and quartz countertop fabrication, Closets and built-in storage, Architectural woodwork, Store fixtures and displays.
You likely have this problem if:
The shop has built from a superseded drawing.
Approvals are verbal, so responsibility for an error is unclear.
Field measurements are captured on paper and re-entered.
Install dates are committed before capacity is checked.
A run had to be remade and nobody could prove which version was approved.
What breaks operationally:
Shop drawings are revised over email and the shop occasionally builds from the wrong version.
Approvals are verbal or implied, so responsibility for an error is unclear.
Template and measurement data is captured on paper and re-entered.
Installation scheduling is disconnected from shop capacity.
What we build:
Versioned drawing approval. One current version, explicitly approved, with the shop unable to release to production against a superseded revision.
Quote to production handoff. Quoted scope carried into the production record without re-entry, so what was sold is what gets built.
Template and measurement capture. Field measurements recorded digitally against the job rather than on a sheet in a van.
Shop capacity and install scheduling. Install dates committed against real production capacity instead of optimism.
How do you stop the shop building from an old drawing?
By making the production release depend on the approved version rather than on a file somebody printed. Superseding a revision should invalidate the print, not just add a newer file to a folder.
Is digital approval worth it if clients are used to email?
The client experience barely changes — they still click a link and approve. What changes is that you can prove which version they approved, which is the only thing that matters when a run has to be remade.
Should quoting and production share data?
Yes, and this is where most shops lose margin quietly. When quoted scope is re-entered for production, small omissions creep in and the shop builds something slightly different from what was priced.
How do you schedule installs realistically?
Against production capacity, not against the calendar. Shops that commit install dates at quote time and then discover capacity are the ones with a permanent backlog of unhappy clients.
Last reviewed 22 August 2026